Petitioner sought liberty to withdraw a writ petition reserving rights to agitate later. With liberty granted, the High Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Liberty to withdraw the petition granted; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~67
NAVED-UL-ISLAM .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Yatendra Singh, Adv.
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Jai Wadhwa, ASC, MCD.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R % 11.07.2024
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
JULY 11, 2024/DA
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/07/2024 at 12:11:07
NAVED-UL-ISLAM
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
