Writ petition before Delhi High Court dismissed for non-prosecution after petitioner failed to appear on the hearing date, despite prior warning of dismissal on non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
NAND KISHOR AGARWAL ..... Petitioner
Through:
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr. Subhrodeep Saha, Advocate for UoI. Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Standing Counsel for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R % 08.05.2024
On 10.01.2024 there was no appearance on behalf of the Petitioner and the matter was adjourned to today and it was made clear that if there is no appearance on behalf of the Petitioner even on the next date of hearing, then the Writ Petition will be dismissed for non prosecution.
Today, there is no appearance on behalf of the Petitioner.
The Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed.
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
MAY 8, 2024 Rahul
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/05/2024 at 11:55:04
Nand Kishor Agarwal
Union of India
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
