Trio Security and Intelligence Pvt. Ltd. v. Sh. Sunil Kumar & Anr.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/248/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The court ordered service on Respondent No. 1 through all permissible modes, returnable on a future date, and directed the filing of an affidavit of service. The petitioner was absent. No substantive decision was rendered.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~46
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(C) 248/2023
¶4
TRIO SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE PVT. LTD......Petitioner Through: None.
¶5
versus
¶6
- SH. SUNIL KUMAR & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Subhash Tanwar, CGSC with Mr. Naveen and Ms. Bhavi Garg, Advocates for R-2.
¶7
CORAM:
¶8
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
¶9
- O R D E R
¶10
- % 28.04.2025
¶11
CM APPL. 48587/2024 (Delay) & CM APPL. 48589/2024 (Restoration)
¶12
- Present none for the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
TRIO SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE PVT. LTD
- respondent
SH. SUNIL KUMAR & ANR.
Coram
AI extract
Manoj Kumar Ohri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court