Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 challenging Central Administrative Tribunal orders in T.A. No. 38/2013 and RA 43/2017 was not pressed by the petitioner after arguments and dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~62
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vijay Joshi, SPC with Mr.Shubham Chaturvedi, Adv. for R- 1
Mr. Ramesh Kumar, mr. Ashutosh Prakash and Mr. Ashish Jain, Advs. for R-2 to R-4
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 07.05.2024
REKHA PALLI, J
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
MAY 7, 2024/rr
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/05/2024 at 11:55:37
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sarpal Singh
Union of India
Rekha Palli
Saurabh Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
