Petitioners sought leave to withdraw their writ petition. Leave was granted, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn, and pending applications were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~49
SARVODAY MANO ADHIKAR CHARITABLE SOCIETY & ANR. .....Petitioners
versus
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS.
.....Respondents Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar and Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Advocates Ms. Latika Malhotra, Advocate for DDA Ms. Richa Dhawan, SC for MCD with Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi, Adv.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
JULY 16, 2024 p’ma
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/07/2024 at 11:33:46
Sarvoday Mano Adhikar Charitable Society & Anr.
The Deputy Commissioner of Police
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
