Disposed

Mrs. Chinu v. Union of India and Ors.

Delhi HC15 Jul 2024W.P.(C)/2631/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court on revival of a disposed petition and separate CM applications directed the respondents to supply a copy of the sanction order, inform the petitioner of any formality for release within a week, and release maintenance to the petitioner and her son forthwith after compliance.

What did the court decide?

Supplied copy of maintenance order and informed of formalities. Maintenance to be released forthwith upon compliance.

Mrs. Chinu Vs Union of India and Ors. — Maintenance and Alimony | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~71

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 2631/2024

¶4

MRS. CHINU .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Pankaj Kaushik, Adv. versus

¶6

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Major Anish Muralidhar, Army

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 04.12.2024

¶11

CM APPL. 70861/2024 and CM APPL. 70862/2024

¶12

CM APPL. 70861/2024 has been filed by the petitioner praying for revival of the petition which was disposed of by this Court vide Order dated 15.07.2024, with the following directions:-

¶13

“4. We accordingly dispose of the writ petition by directing the respondents to take a final decision, as per law, on the petitioner„s applications for maintenance by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 08 weeks. Needless to state, this would be subject to the petitioner cooperating with the respondents and furnishing any further information as may be required by the respondents for which purpose written communication will be issued to her by the respondents through her counsel.

¶14

5. It is further directed that in case the petitioner is found to be entitled to receive maintenance, the same will be granted to her within four weeks from the date of the decision. However, in the event, her claim is rejected by the respondents, it will be open for the petitioner to seek legal recourse as permissible in law.”

¶15

CM APPL. 70862/2024 has also been filed by the petitioner,

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2024 at 11:59:47

¶18

praying for release of Rs. 1 lakh towards pending alimony and costs of legal proceedings from the respondents.

¶19

Major Anish Muralidhar (Army), who appears on advance notice of these applications, has handed over a copy of the Order dated 07.11.2024 passed by the General Officer Commanding-in-Chief, sanctioning grant of maintenance to the petitioner and her son. The same is taken on record. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a copy of this order has not been received by the petitioner. Major Anish Muralidhar is directed to supply a copy of this order to the learned counsel for the petitioner, through e-mail. 5. In case, there is any further formality to be completed by the petitioner for release of the maintenance amount, the same should be specifically informed by the respondents to the petitioner, by way of a written communication to be sent on the same email of the learned counsel for the petitioner, no later than one week from today. On completion of the formalities, the maintenance with effect from the date of the order be released to the petitioner and her son forthwith.

¶20

List for reporting compliance on 17^th December, 2024 in the ‘ Supplementary List‟ .

¶21

NAVIN CHAWLA, J

¶22

SHALINDER KAUR, J

¶23

DECEMBER 4, 2024 SU/SK/SJ

¶24

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶25

This is a digitally signed order.

¶26

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2024 at 11:59:47

Mrs. Chinu v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs. Chinu v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gyanankur Vs Food Corporation of India & Ors.

Shukla Rani Vs Union of India & Ors.

Mata Krishnawati Memorial Education Society & Anr. Vs Delhi Development Authority

Arjun Kolhi & Anr. Vs New Delhi Municipal Council & Ors.

Union of India & Ors. Vs Sh. Om Prakash Singh

M/S Paras Impex Vs Office of the Commissioner of Customs (Export) & Ors.

Hazrat Nizamuddin Welfare Association Regd Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors. & Ors.

Evermore Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 7-1 Delhi

Sandeep Trikha and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Ajeet Singh and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Faruqe Khan Dead through Mojma Khatun Vs Dgp Crpf and Anr.

Mahesh Yadav Vs Union of India & Anr.

Si (Gd) Ajay Khungur Daimari Vs Shri Ajay Kumar Bhalla and Ors.

Sub M Bishma Rao through Pairokar M Sujatha Vs Union of India and Ors.