The petitioner failed to respond for three hearings. The respondent filed a status report. The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
NAYEEM HYDER .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rahul Gupta, Adv.
versus
EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION .....Respondent Through: Mr. Siddhant Nath, SC for MCD with Mr. Zaid, Adv. Mr. Vikrant Rana, Ms. Devika Mehra, Mrs. Bindra Rana and Mr. Avik Gopal, Advs. for R-3.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 15.07.2024
CM APPL. 19826/2022 (Ex.)
W.P.(C) 6541/2022
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/07/2024 at 12:08:33
instructions.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
JULY 15, 2024/P
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/07/2024 at 12:08:33
NAYEEM HYDER
EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
