Writ petition for quashing summary record dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioners were absent when the State opposed filing of forged Aadhar cards.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~59
MS. NISHA KUMARI & ANR ..... Petitioners
Represented by: None.
versus
THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC with ASI Babulal, PS Ranhola. Mr. Ranvir Vats and Mr. Vaibhav Arora, Advocate for R-2 and R-3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Present none for the petitioners. Even on last date none was present on behalf of the petitioners when learned Additional Standing counsel for the State informed that the copy of the Aadhar Card filed by the petitioners is forged and fabricated.
Petition is thus dismissed for non-prosecution.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JULY 10, 2018 ‘yo’
MS. NISHA KUMARI & ANR
THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ORS
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
