Sahil Amin v. State & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi dismissed a criminal writ petition as withdrawn, providing liberty for the petitioner to raise pleas before the Trial Court during the trial stage.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawn with liberty to take pleas before the Trial Court at the stage of charge.
What the court decided
$~29
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 2581/2017 SAHIL AMIN ... Petitioner
Represented by: Mr.Tabrez Ahmed, Advocate versus STATE & ANR ... Respondents Represented by: Mr.R.S.Kundu, ASC with Mr.Bhagat Singh and Mr.Prem Sagar Pal, Advocates and SI Shailesh, PS New Usmanpur
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 08.01.2018
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to take all the pleas before the learned Trial Court at the stage of charge if need arises.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JANUARY 08, 2018 ‘rk’
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sahil Amin
- respondent
State
Coram
Mukta Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court