Robin @ Jo-Jo v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought parole to file a Special Leave Petition. The High Court found no sound surety and noted the SLP could be filed from jail, dismissing the petition for lack of grounds.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed; parole denied.
What the court decided
$~7
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 1839/2017
| ROBIN @ JO-JO | ..... Petitioner | |
|---|---|---|
| Represented by: | Mr. Nitish Chaudhary, Adv. for Mr. Chetan Lokur, Adv. DHCLSC. |
|
| versus | ||
| STATE | ..... Respondent | |
| Represented by: | Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Mr. Jamal |
|
| Akhtar, Adv. with Insp. Naresh Kumar PS Burari. |
||
| CORAM: |
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 08.01.2018
By this petition the petitioner seeks parole on the ground that he has to file a Special Leave Petition. The application of the petitioner was rejected by the competent authority vide communication dated 26th May, 2016.
On verification the only relative found to be residing in India is the sister and brother-in-law of the petitioner at Alipur Daur, Tea Estate, PS Kalchini, District Jalpaiguri, West Bengal. However, the brother-in-law of the petitioner is hesitant to keep the petitioner with him while on parole.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to parole to file a Special Leave Petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Robin @ Jo-Jo
- respondent
State
Coram
Mukti Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court