THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
Parole petition dismissed as petitioner had already been granted two periods of furlough to re-establish social ties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25# $~
| * | IN THE HIGH | COURT OF DE | LHI AT NEW DELHI |
|---|---|---|---|
| + | W.P.(CRL) 1883/ | 2017 | |
| TILAK RAJ | Represented by: | ..... Petitioner Mr. Rahul K. Dubey, Advocate. |
|
| versus | |||
| STATE | ..... Respondent | ||
| Represented by: | Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, Additional Standing Counsel for State with Inspector |
||
| Yogesh, SHO, Khajuri Khas and ASI Bhupender, PS Khajuri Khas. |
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 09.01.2018
W.P.(CRL) 1883/2017 Page 1 of 2
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JANUARY 09, 2018 ‘vn’
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(CRL) 1883/2017
Tilak Raj
State
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
