Disposed
Puschpender v. State
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/46/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged delayed parole disposal. Court stayed petition, directing parole application disposal within two weeks.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed with direction to dispose parole application within two weeks.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~27
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(CRL) 46/2018
¶4
PUSCHPENDER ..... Petitioner
¶5
Through : Ms.Pallavi S.Kansal, Advocate with Mr.Saurabh Kansal & Mr.Sudhanshu Tiwari, Advocates.
¶6
versus
¶7
..... Respondent
¶8
STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Jamal Akhtar, proxy counsel for Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with SI Karamvir, PS Narela.
¶9
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R % 08.01.2018
¶10
- During the course of arguments, it was urged by the learned counsel for the petitioner that his application for parole has yet not been disposed of.
¶11
- Learned proxy counsel for the State informs that the application of the petitioner shall be disposed of within two weeks.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Puschpender
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
George P. Chinnappa Garg
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court