This single-paragraph order dismisses a contempt petition as withdrawn by the applicant. The respondent counsel had no objection. The application is disposed of and the fixed date is cancelled.
Contempt petition dismissed as withdrawn; application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
SUNIL YADAV ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Joydeep Sana, Adv.
versus
V RAMGOPAL RAO & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. T. Singhdev, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R % 16.03.2018
CM No. 10138/2018
This is an application filed by the applicant / petitioner for withdrawal of the contempt petition.
Mr. T. Singhdev, learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection in the withdrawal of the contempt petition.
Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Application stands disposed of.
Date already fixed, i.e., May 3, 2018 stands cancelled.
MARCH 16, 2018 /jg
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for withdrawal of contempt proceedings should be allowed.
SUNIL YADAV
V RAMGOPAL RAO & ANR
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
