Disposed
Rajender Aggarwal v. East Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/4264/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
RAJENDER AGGARWAL ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person. versus
EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS
..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Pravesh Thakur, Adv. for EDMC with Mr. Praveen Kumar (J.E./EDMC)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R
% 15.03.2018
The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:
A latest status report has been filed in the court and the same has been
taken on record and the same reads as under:
“As per the directions of Hon’ble High Court of Delhi dated 17.5.2017 a joint inspection on 19.05.2017 was carried out in presence of petitioner Sh. Rajender Kumar Aggarwal along with Sh. Girish Prakash A.E. EDMC, Sh. Kapil Sharma, L.I. EDMC and Sh. Sattan ASI Delhi Police. During the inspection it was found that there existed no encroachment around the C-Block, Dilshad Garden market. A letter to area SHO has been written vide No. EE[M.Shah.(N)]-I/2017-18/D-366 dated 25.05.2017 to keep the area encroachment free. As regard installation of the camera around the area a request has been sent to the E.E. electrical EDMC for taking necessary action vide no. EE[M.Shah.(N)]-I/2017-18/D-365 dated 25.05.2017 enclosing the order of the Hon’ble High Court dated 17.05.2017. However a regular watch is being kept regarding encroachment in C-Block Dilshad garden Market, Delhi. Joint inspection report and photographs are attached herewith.”
Taking the stand of the respondent Nos.1 and 2 on record, it is made clear, that in future if any encroachment takes place in the area, the concerned SHO and the Executive Engineer of the concerned EDMC shall be held personally responsible. In case of any encroachment in violation of this order, liberty is also with the petitioner to file an application for revival of this writ petition.
The writ petition is disposed of.
MARCH 15, 2018 /aky
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
RAJENDER AGGARWAL
EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court