Petitioner withdrew a contempt petition to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Contempt petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~60
GOKUL CHAND ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. M.C. Dhingra, Adv.
versus
SATYA PRAKASH TRIVEDI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Preet Singh, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO O R D E R % 21.03.2018
CM. No. 11003/2018 (for exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
CONT.CAS(C) 212/2018
After some submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the contempt petition to enable the petitioner approach the Central Administrative Tribunal by way of contempt petition.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
MARCH 21, 2018 /jg
GOKUL CHAND
SATYA PRAKASH TRIVEDI & ORS
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
