The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition to file a review. The High Court of Delhi dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~42
SATISH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Vatsa and Mr. Jeetin Jhala, Advs.
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Adv. for GNCTD with ASI Barmeshwar, PS-Mehrauli. Mr. Tushar Sannu, Adv. for SDMC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
It is the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner was not a party in the W.P.(C) 8055/2012, wherein directions have been given pursuant to which action is being taken against the petitioner.
At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition to enable the petitioner, file a review petition.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
MARCH 16, 2018 /jg
SATISH KUMAR GUPTA
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
