Disposed
Hitender v. Ashim Khurana
Delhi HCCONT.CAS(C)/168/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Signing Date:18.01.2025 17:29:15 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file an d no page is missing.
u
versus
ASHIMKHURANA Respondent ' Through Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC I . . CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL ORDER
% 06.07.2018
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties state that, in view of the circumstance that the result has .been declared and the petitioners have been found to be qualified, the present proceedings have been rendered infru'ctuous.
The present petitions are disposed of accordingly.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JULY 06, 2018
as
NOT SPECIFIED
ASHIM KHURANA
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court