Allowed

Alok @ Sumit v. the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC16 Jul 2018BAIL APPLN./168/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted bail to the petitioners in FIR Nos. 79/2014 under specific IPC and Juvenile Justice provisions. Bail was contingent on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with sureties and agreeing to conditions including avoiding contact with the complainant. The court noted that a settlement amount of Rs. 3 lacs had been tendered.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners restrained from arrest, released on personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with sureties, subject to conditions.

Alok @ Sumit Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

Signature Not Verified Signing Date:07.10.2024 17:02:15 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file an d no page is missing.

¶2

363/370/374 of the Indian.Penal Code 1860 and sections 75/79 Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 registered at Police Station JahangirPuri. - '

¶3

t The complainant has sought an outstanding amount of Rs.1.8 lacs from the petitioners along with the proprietorf . of the firm-Mr.' Sanjay Kumar ,Singh, the petitioners are ready and willing to settle the lis and all claims aproposcomplainantand the victimby payingan amountof Rs.3 lacs.

¶4

The complainantis presentwith her motherand has been identifiedby the Investigating Officer. A Demand Draft.bearing No.037865 for the sum of Rs.3 lacs dated 12.07.2018 drawn on HDFC Bank has been handed over to her today in the court through the proprietor of the entity which had engaged her for,domestic services.'

¶5

In the circumstances, a ,case is made out by the petitioners for grant of interim protection.

¶6

Consequently,it is directedthat in the eventof arrestof the petiticmers in FIR No. 79/2014 dated 31.01.2014 under sections 363/370/374 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 and sections 75/79 Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 they be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/-with a surety each in the like amount to the satisfactionof the Arresting/InvestigatingOfficer,subjectto.thefollowingconditions:

¶7

(i) the petitionersshall continue to participatethe investigation.as and when he is so intimated by the Investigating Officer; .

¶8

(ii) they shall make no attempt, directly or indirectly, to contact'the '

¶9

• -

¶10

complainantor her relatives or close associates;

¶11

(iii) .They shall furnish his mobile phone number to the SHO concerned, which shall be kept operationalat all times, so that the police could contact them;

¶12

(iv) they shall not make any effort to evade the process of law; and (v) in case of change of the phone numbers or address, the petitioners shall inform the police forthwith.

¶13

Any observation made in this order shall have no bearing on the

¶14

merits of the case...

¶15

•

¶16

The bail applications are disposed off.

¶17

NAJ^ WAZIRI, J.

¶18

JULY 16, 2018

¶19

sa •

Alok @ Sumit v. the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Alok @ Sumit v. the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Navratan Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Shakti Singh & Anr. Vs State & Ors.

Rukhwani & Ors. Vs State & Anr.

Pritpal Singh & Anr. Vs State & Ors.

Dhananjay Kumar Singh Vs State (Govt of NCT Delhi)

Sandeep Nagar Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi