Dismissed
Rupa Sharma v. Saumya Gupta & Anr.
Delhi HCCONT.CAS(C)/225/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~57
SAUMYA GUPTA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Adv. for GNCTD with Ms. Anushruti, Adv.
The present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging violation of order dated November 15, 2017 in W.P. (C) 6988/2017, whereby it was directed that the representation of the petitioner dated May 11, 2017 against his suspension will be decided within four weeks.
It is the submission of learned counsel for the respondent No.1, who appears on advance notice that the speaking order has been passed and the same shall be communicated to the petitioner and her counsel during the course of the day.
If that be so, the contempt petition is closed. If the petitioner is still aggrieved by the order to be communicated to her, she shall be at liberty to seek such remedy as available to her in accordance with law.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
APRIL 02, 2018 /aky
RUPA SHARMA
SAUMYA GUPTA & ANR
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court