granted by the Govt. of India to the petitioners for running the de-addiction centres. That apart, a perusal of the guidelines issued by the Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment, Govt. of India only reveal that the same are for grant of financial assistance. It is conceded by Mr. Sapra that no such financial assistance is being given by the said Ministry to the petitioners. If that be so, the plea of Mr. Sapra that the petitioners are following the guidelines issued by the Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment, Govt. of India is of no consequence / effect, as the Ministry .has no control, over the petitioners/centres. The plea of Mr. Sapra that in the absence of any express provision debarring the petitioners from running a de-addiction centre and as such, the petitioners are within their right to run the same is concerned, the same is also without any merit. There is no, dispute that in the process of their activity of running de-addiction centres, the petitioners admit the inmates for de-addiction programme.. They deal with the life and the liberty of such individuals as they house them in their centres. Surely, the - reasoning in the impugned orders that the petitioners are. dealing with life and personal liberty of an individual without any authorisation by a governmental agency, is appealing. It must be stated here that the regulatory/supervisory jurisdiction of Government become relevant in this background. In fact, in the PIL referred to above, this Court keeping in view the necessity of framing the guidelines has directed so. That apart, the submission of Mr. Ajjay Aroraa, learned counsel for NDMC that such centres, are running from unauthorized colonies /from prernises constructed without following byelaws and without having proper fire safety norms is also appealing. It must also be stated here that this Court in its order dated October 30, 2017, has in para 9 directed as under:- .
