Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition exercising withdrawal of right to continue the suit, with liberty to file an application for advancement of date of hearing before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, which was granted by the Court.
Leave and liberty granted to withdraw petition with liberty to institute appropriate application before DRT.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
SONALI KAPOOR
..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Ajay Khanna, Advocate
versus
PUNJAB AND SIND BANK ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ajay Dabas and Ms. Priyanka Dagar, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
O R D E R % 15.05.2018
After some arguments, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to institute an appropriate application before the learned DRT seeking advancement of the date of hearing in the application instituted on their behalf seeking an extension.
Leave and liberty granted.
The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
MAY 15, 2018/ as
Sonali Kapoor
Punjab and Sind Bank
Siddharth Mridul
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
