Petitioners, school employees, sought a direction to respondents to examine complaints against Nos. 4 and 5. Respondents stated a Committee was constituted to examine complaints following natural justice principles. Petitioners withdrew the petition.
The petition was disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
DR RAJ KUMAR SHARMA & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. A.S. Singh and Mr. Bal Kishan, Advocates.
versus G N C T OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, standing counsel for GNCTD and Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advocate for R-1 and 2. Mr. Amit Bansal and Ms. Seema Dolo, Advocates for R-3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
O R D E R
% 16.05.2018
Vide the present petition, the petitioners, who are employees of respondent No.4/school have sought a direction to the respondent Nos. 1 and 2, to examine their complaints made against respondent nos.4 & 5.
On the last date, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 had sought time to get appropriate instructions. Today, Ms.Ahlawat submits that respondent No.2 has already constituted a Committee to examine the complaints made by the petitioners. She further submits that while examining the petitioners’ complaints, the Committee will duly follow the principles of natural justice and give adequate
opportunity to all the effected parties. She submits that based on the Committee’s report, further action, if needed, would thereafter be taken by respondent no.2 by following due procedure as per law.
In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent No.1 and 2, learned counsel for the petitioners does not wish to press the present petition.
It is, however, made clear that this Court has neither examined the merits of the case nor expressed any opinion on the allegations made by the petitioners and the same will be considered on their own merits by respondent No.2.
The petition is disposed of as not pressed.
REKHA PALLI, J
MAY 16, 2018
rd
Dr. Raj Kumar Sharma & Anr.
G N C T of Delhi
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
