The Division Bench allowed two writ petitions, setting aside earlier orders, by holding that the matters were covered by decisions in W.P.(C) No.9359/2017 and W.P.(C) 332/2017.
The order dated 17.01.2015 in W.P.(C) No.881/2018 set aside; both petitions allowed and disposed of in terms of the order dated 12.01.2018 in W.P.(C) 332/2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11 and 12.
W.P.(C) 881/2018 and W.P.(C) 926/2018
Page 1 of 2
HIMA KOHLI, J
PRATIBHA RANI, J
MAY 15, 2018 na/rkb
W.P.(C) 881/2018 and W.P.(C) 926/2018
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present petitions are covered by the decisions in W.P.(C) No.9359/2017 and W.P.(C) 332/2017.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
SI/GD Shambhoo vs. Union of India & Ors.Followed¶5
W.P.(C) No.9359/2017
Jas Ram vs. Union of India and Ors.Followed¶5
W.P.(C) 332/2017
Jas Ram vs. Union of India and Ors.Followed¶9
W.P.(C) 332/2017
Gajraj Singh
Jaswant Singh
Union of India
Hima Kohli
Pratibha Rani
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Hima Kohli and Pratibha Rani
Parties & counsel
