Petitions dismissed as withdrawn pursuant to counsel’s statement of intending to approach the Division Bench.
Petitions and connected applications dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AM UL YA
respondent / NDMC state that the impugned action has been taken pursuant to directions given by the Division Bench of this Court in a Public Interest Litigation being W.P.C) 2612/2017. They also state that a similar writ petition was listed before Hon'ble Mr. Justice Najmi Waziri on April 16, 2018 which was dismissed.
Mr. S.K. Khanna, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners at this stage states, he shall approach the Division Bench by way of an appropriate application by tomorrow.
The petitions and the connected applications are dismissed as withdrawn.
A copy of this ordk be given dasti under the Signatures of the Court Master. .
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
APRIL 18, 2018/7g
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
