Disposed

Sachin Nandal v. Union of India & Anr.

Delhi HC9 Apr 2018W.P.(C)/3442/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition by an applicant for a marketing assistant post who claims his selection process was put on hold after verification and medical examination. The Court directed the respondent to treat the petitioner's legal notice as a representation and pass a speaking order within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the second respondent to treat the Legal Notice dated 19.02.2018 as a representation and pass a speaking order within four weeks.

Sachin Nandal Vs Union of India & Anr. — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶2

Date of Order: April 09, 2018

¶3

W.P.(C) 3442/2018 SACHIN NANDAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Yashpal Rangi, Advocate

¶4

Versus

¶5

UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Mehta & Mr. Rajat Sehgal, Advocates

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

¶7

ORDER

¶8

(ORAL)

¶9

Petitioner claims to have applied for the post of Marketing Assistant in pursuance to Advertisement No. GAIL/OPEN/MISC/1/2017 issued by second respondent and is said to have participated in the written examination. According to petitioner, an e-mail was received from 2^nd respondent on 18^th January, 2018 asking petitioner to come for verification of original certificates and for pre-employment medical examination scheduled on 10^th / 11^th February, 2018.

¶10

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner had produced his original certificates for verification and had undergone the medical examination but thereafter, petitioner was orally told that his case has been put on hold. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that there is no

¶11

Page 1 of 2

¶12

W.P.(C) 3442/2018

¶13

response to Legal Notice of 19^th February, 2018 (Annexure P-6) sent on behalf of petitioner to second respondent.

¶14

In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition with direction to second respondent to consider Legal Notice of 19^th February, 2018 (Annexure P-6) as a Representation and to pass a speaking order thereon, within a period of four weeks. The fate of Legal Notice of 19^th February, 2018 (Annexure P-6) be conveyed to petitioner within a week thereafter, so that petitioner may avail of the remedies, as available in law, if need be.

¶15

With aforesaid directions, this petition is disposed of. Copy of this order be given dasti to counsel representing both the

¶16

sides.

¶17

(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE

¶18

APRIL 09, 2018 r

¶19

Page 2 of 2

¶20

W.P.(C) 3442/2018

Sachin Nandal v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sachin Nandal v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D M Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Trade & Taxes & Anr.

Mohd. Arif and Ors. Vs Kulachi Hansraj Model School and Ors.

Devendra Kumar and Anr. Vs Bal Bharti Public School and Ors.

Master Hardik Sharma (Minor) through His Mother Geeta Sharma Vs Bal Bharti Public School & Anr.

Sudhir Vohra Vs Council of Architecture & Ors.

Ram Chet & Ors. Vs State Bank of India

Dipesh Goswami & Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Zakir Husen and Ors. Vs Commissioner of Police and Ors.

Master Hardik Sharma (Minor) through His Mother Geeta Sharma Vs Bal Bharti Public School & Anr.

Suresh Kumar Yadav Vs Union of India & Ors.

Vasudha Srivastava Vs Union of India & Anr.

Balbir Kaur Dahele Vs Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Managing Committee & Ors.

Jaskinder Kaur & Ors. Vs Punjabi Academy & Ors.

Ram Krishn Rajpal Vs Union of India & Ors.