Petitioner challenged the nomination of a respondent to the Council of Architecture, claiming lack of Lt. Governor's concurrence. Respondents clarified that concurrences was accorded ex-post-facto, leading to dismissal of the challenge.
The writ petition as well as the application are disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
W.P.(C)No.7170/2017 Page 1 of 2
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
APRIL 10, 2018 aj
W.P.(C)No.7170/2017 Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the quashing of a nomination letter to the Council of Architecture is required given that the Lt. Governor has accorded concurrence ex-post-facto.
Sudhir Vohra
Council of Architecture
Government of NCT of Delhi
Gita Mittal
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
