Disposed
D M Exports Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Trade & Taxes & Anr.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/1884/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~05
versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES & ANR...... Respondent Through Mr. Rishikesh Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R % 06.04.2018
Counsel for the petitioner states that refund has been paid. He, however, states that some interest has been paid, but the same is not in accordance with law and the judicial pronouncements of the Delhi High Court.
The respondents would pass a speaking on the question of interest, which would be communicated to the petitioner within a period of 15 days. Petitioner, if aggrieved, would be entitled to challenge the same in accordance with law.
Recording the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
APRIL 06, 2018 NA
D M EXPORTS PVT LTD
COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES
Sanjiv Khanna
Chander Shekhar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court