Petitioner, a TGT, sought implementation of Sixth Central Pay Commission recommendations. Court permitted filing of a concise representation and directed the authority to decide within six weeks.
Permission to file a concise representation; direction to decide within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of Order: April 09, 2018
+ W.P.(C) 3421/2018
BALBIR KAUR DAHELE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurab Chadda & Mr. Rohit Bhagat, Advocates
Versus
DELHI SIKH GURUDWARA MANAGING COMMITTEE & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh & Mr. Aditya Madaan, Advocates for respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. V. Balaji, Advocate for respondent No.3
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
ORDER (ORAL)
W.P.(C) 3421/2018
Page 1 of 2
Representation before respondent No.2 within two weeks. If such a Representation is received by second respondent, then it be decided by passing a speaking order within a period of six weeks and the fate of Representation be made known to petitioner within a week thereafter, so that petitioner may avail of the remedies, as available in law, if need be.
(SUNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
APRIL 09, 2018
r
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 3421/2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a concise representation should be permitted to the second respondent for implementation of Sixth Central Pay Commission recommendations.
Balbir Kaur Dahale
Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Managing Committee
Directorate of Education
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
