This single-paragraph order records the dismissal of the writ petition. The court observed that the petitioner had not appeared on several dates and was no longer interested in prosecuting the matter. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed for default and non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
HARVINDER SINGH ..... Petitioner Through None
versus
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Om Prakash, Mr. Rajeev Pathak and Mr. Pradeep Kumar Tripathi, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 10.05.2018
None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner today. There has been no appearance on behalf of the petitioner since several dates of hearing, (though on 5th April, 2008, apparently by error the name of learned counsel for the respondent has been shown on behalf of the petitioner). It appears that petitioner is no longer interested in prosecuting this matter.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default and nonprosecution.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
MAY 10, 2018 gb
Harvinder Singh
Food Corporation of India & Ors
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
