Dismissed
Rajbir Singh Dua & Anr. v. Uma Thukral & Anr.
Delhi HCCONT.CAS(C)/108/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
RAJBIR SINGH DUA & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Hemant Malhotra, Advocate.
versus
UMA THUKRAL & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms. Ekta Sikri and Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R
% 02.11.2017
Ms. Sikri, ld. counsel for the respondent submits that as of today, physical possession of the subject property already stands with the petitioners. Mr. Malhotra ld. counsel for the petitioner on his part however, submits that the possession has not come to be received by the petitioner in strict compliance of the undertaking given to this Court and it has not been fair on the part of the respondents. Ld. counsel for the respondents on her part however, submits that there was some delay, but, it was not intentional, inasmuch as, on 1.1.2017 itself, the respondents were wishing to handover the physical possession of the part of the property, which was actually in their possession, but, the petitioners did not join for the purpose and as and when the respondents, got the remaining possession also, in the execution proceedings against the occupants, immediately thereupon,
the entire property has come to be handed over and it was so taken over by the petitioners.
Keeping in view the totality of the facts and circumstances and the statements made, this Court does not consider it appropriate to proceed further with the instant proceedings and the petition is disposed off accordingly.
A. K. CHAWLA, J
NOVEMBER 02, 2017
rc
RAJBIR SINGH DUA & ANR
UMA THUKRAL & ANR
A. K. CHAWLA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court