Dismissed

Shamim Bano v. Naresh Kumar Bhardwaj & Ors.

Delhi HC3 Nov 2017CONT.CAS(C)/1199/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal contempt petition challenging violation of demolition order against unauthorised construction was disposed of after status report confirmed demolition actions were taken, rendering property uninhabitable. Court quashed contempt proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition disposed of as department demonstrated compliance via demolition actions rendering property uninhabitable.

Shamim Bano Vs Naresh Kumar Bhardwaj & Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2017)

¶1

$~20

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

CONT.CAS(C) 1199/2016 SHAMIM BANO ..... Petitioner Through Mr. M Hasibuddin, Adv versus

¶4

NARESH KUMAR BHARDWAJ & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. G D Mishra, dv for R-1 SI Om Prakash PS Hauz Khas Mr. Riya Gulati, Adv for R-2

¶5

CORAM:

¶6

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R

¶7

% 03.11.2017

¶8

Instant petition has come to be filed alleging violation of the order dated 24^th August, 2016, whereunder, respondent-SDMC was required to take action against unauthorised constructions. As per the status report dated 3^rd August, 2017, it is stated as follows:-

¶9

“.. that pursuant to demolition order already passed in respect of the property in question, it is submitted that the department has taken / carried out further demolition action on dated 12/07/2017 and 2/08/2017 as per the following details:-

¶10

SNo	Date of Action	Action taken
1	12/07/2017	Upon availability of police force
		demolished 2 main side walls at third floor, 2 ain side walls at second floor
		and remaining

¶11

		RCC roof of third floor.
2	02/08/2017	Upon availability of police for demolished remaining RCC slabs at ground,
		first, second and third floor on its front side

¶12

The photographs of the above referred demolition actions are also annexed herewith as Annexure – ‘A’ (Colly). 3. That further, upon taking the above referred demolition actions in respect of the property in question a letter has also been written to the concerned SHO vide bearing no.D/14242/B-I/SZ/2017 dated 02/08/2017 with the request to instruct that patrolling staff to keep strict vigil at site so that the owner/builder shall not restore the demolished portion or raise further construction or occupy the same. The copy of said letters as issued are annexed herewith as AnnexureB.

¶13

4. That it is further stated that s can also be observed from the above demolition action/photographs annexed that presently the property in question has been made uninhabitable / beyond use.”

¶14

In view of the action stated to have been taken, contempt petition is disposed off.

¶15

A. K. CHAWLA, J

¶16

NOVEMBER 03, 2017 SM

Shamim Bano v. Naresh Kumar Bhardwaj & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shamim Bano v. Naresh Kumar Bhardwaj & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajbir Singh Dua & Anr. Vs Uma Thukral & Anr.

Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd. Vs Padmesh Gupta & Anr.

Hem Singh Vs K K Goswami

Ravinder Yadav Vs Rajiv Gauba and Ors.

Inderjeet Kaur & Anr. Vs Ravinder Singh Lovely & Ors.

Megha Grover & Anr. Vs Ravinder Singh Lovely & Ors.

Shri Swarn Singh & Ors. Vs Ravinder Singh Lovely & Ors.

Lords International School Vs R.K Chaturvedi & Anr.

Rajbir Singh Dua & Anr. Vs Uma Thukral & Anr.

Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd. Vs Padmesh Gupta & Anr.

Rais Ur Rehman Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Madan Kumar Vs University of Delhi & Anr.

Syed Wajid Ali Nizami Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation (Sdmc) and Ors.

M.S.Gahlot Vs Bses