In default proceedings where the respondent was present and the petitioner did not appear, the petition seeking review of an order dated 1.5.2017 was dismissed.
Petition for review of order dated 1.5.2017 dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
RAJEEV KUMAR BANSAL ..... Petitioner Through None.
versus
MM KUTTY DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ANR
..... Respondents Through Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Ms. Niti Jain, Advocate for GNCTD/R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R % 01.11.2017
Mr. Aggarwal, ld, ASC submits that the petition has been filed seeking review of the order dated 1.5.2017, which is allegedly violated. None appears for the petitioner. Dismissed in default.
A. K. CHAWLA, J
NOVEMBER 01, 2017
rc
RAJEEV KUMAR BANSAL
MM KUTTY DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION
A. K. CHAWLA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
