The High Court of Delhi allowed an appeal in a matrimonial matter subject to exceptions and dismissed the appeal on withdrawal. A separate hyphen application regarding compliance with a prior payment order was disposed of with consent.
Appeal allowed subject to exceptions; appeal subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
BHUPINDER SINGH ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Shaad Anwar, Advocate.
versus
SONIA ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Nitesh Kumar, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
O R D E R % 10.08.2016
CM No.14753/2016
Allowed subject to all just exceptions.
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 45/2015
CM No.14752/2016
non-payment of the sums required to be paid by the appellant in terms of order dated May 10, 2016 she would be entitled to execute the same in which the issue of compliance would be decided.
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
PRATIBHA RANI, J.
AUGUST 10, 2016 ‘st’
Page 2 of 2
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 45/2015
BHUPINDER SINGH
SONIA
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
PRATIBHA RANI
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
