The Court disposed of an application under MAT.APP.(F.C.) 58/2016 setting aside an order that had closed the appellant's right to file a written statement in the underlying matrimonial proceedings.
Impugned order dated August 26, 2015 set aside; two weeks time granted to file written statement subject to payment of Rs. 10,000/-.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
SHRUTI CHOPRA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Sumeet Anand & Mr.Sumit R.Sharma, Advocates
versus
KAPIL CHORPA & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.S.K.Duggal & Mr.Vinod, Advocates for R-1
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
O R D E R % 09.08.2016
CM No.14732/2016
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 58/2016
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 58/2016
Page 1 of 2
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
PRATIBHA RANI, J.
AUGUST 09, 2016/ ‘pg’
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 58/2016
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant's right to file a written statement can be restored by condoning delay and granting time.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shruti Chopra
Kapil Chorpa
Pradeep Nandrajog
Pratibha Rani
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
