The High Court dismissed CMPs for withdrawal of an appeal and retention of remedies. In a separate matter, the Court allowed a Mat.App.(F.C.) condoning delay and disposing the application.
Allowed application condoning 8-day delay; dismissed appeal as withdrawn preserving remedies; dismissed stay application as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
SANDEEP MARWAH ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Vivek Aggarwal, Advocate with Ms.Nazoo Sharma, Adv.
versus
KARJRI MARWAH ..... Respondent Represented by: None CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
O R D E R
% 12.08.2016
CM No.25997/2016
Allowed.
CM No.25998/2016
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 97/2016
Act and all pleas shall be available to the appellant if he be aggrieved by the order with which passed.
CM No.25996/2016
Since the appeal is withdrawn the instant application which seeks stay for the operation of the main order is dismissed as infructuous.
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
PRATIBHA RANI, J.
AUGUST 12, 2016 ‘pg’
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 97/2016
Page 2 of 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sandeep Marwah
Karjri Marwah
Pradeep Nandrajog
Pratibha Rani
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
