Dismissed

Sughra Bi Alias Sughra Begum (Now Deceased) Thr Lrs v. Tirath Ram Shah Charitable Trust & Ors.

Delhi HC10 Aug 2016RFA(OS)/19/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court adjudicated an appeal wherein the appellants filed a compromise application stating they settled disputes and agreed to hand over vacant possession of the property in exchange for payment. The court deemed the appeal infructuous based on this settlement.

What did the court decide?

The appeal is disposed of as infructuous without order as to costs.

Sughra Bi Alias Sughra Begum (Now Deceased) Thr Lrs Vs… — Property and Title | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

$~12

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

RFA(OS) 19/2016

¶4

SUGHRA BI ALIAS SUGHRA BEGUM (NOW DECEASED) THR LRS ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.S.D.Ansari, Advocate.

¶5

versus

¶6

TIRATH RAM SHAH CHARITABLE TRUST & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Ajay Kumar Tandon, Advocate.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

¶9

O R D E R % 10.08.2016

¶10

RFA(OS) 19/2016

¶11

Learned counsel for the parties have shown to us an application signed by all appellants who are the legal heirs of Sughra Bi. As per the application various disputes between the parties have been settled. As per the application the instant appeal has to be disposed of as infructuous for the reason the appellants have agreed to handover vacant physical possession of the suit property to the respondents.

¶12

As per the settlement the respondents have to pay a sum of ₹11,50,000/- to appellant No.1: Iqbal Ahmad who, as per the settlement, would receive the cheque on behalf of all the appellants which will include legal heirs of one deceased appellant.

¶13

RFA(OS) 19/2016

¶14

Page 1 of 2

¶15

Learned counsel for the respondent has produced a cheque drawn in the name of Iqbal Ahmad. It is drawn on Axis Bank Ltd. It is dated August 10, 2016. It is in the sum of ₹11.5 lacs.

¶16

The cheque has to be handed over to Iqbal Ahmad simultaneously when vacant physical possession of the subject property shall be handed over to the representative of Tirath Ram Shah Charitable Trust.

¶17

Challenge in the appeal is to a decree dated November 02, 2015. Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been availed of successfully by the respondents against the appellants.

¶18

In view of the settlement between the parties, the appeal is disposed of as infructuous without there being any order as to costs. The compromise application shall be filed in the suit which is still pending. CM No.7716/2016

¶19

Dismissed as infructuous.

¶20

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

¶21

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

¶22

AUGUST 10, 2016 ‘st’

¶23

RFA(OS) 19/2016

¶24

Page 2 of 2

Sughra Bi Alias Sughra Begum (Now Deceased) Thr Lrs v. Tirath Ram Shah Charitable Trust & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sughra Bi Alias Sughra Begum (Now Deceased) Thr Lrs v. Tirath Ram Shah Charitable Trust & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S J M Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs Krishna Sachdev & Ors.

Shruti Chopra Vs Kapil Chorpa & Anr.

Organizing Committee Commonwealth Games, 2010 Vs Pico Deepali Overlays Consortium

Kawal Bahadur Singh Batra Vs Jas Kiran Kaur

Deepak Anant Vs Kamiya

Wg Cdr (Retd) Yeshvir Singh Tomar Vs Dr O P Kohli & Ors.