The High Court of Delhi approved the withdrawal of an appeal and three pending applications filed by the appellant without advancing any arguments, noting that court fee was unpaid but an extension had been granted.
Allowed withdrawal of appeal and three captioned applications. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
M/S J M CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.N.K.Vohra, Advocate
versus
KRISHNA SACHDEV & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
O R D E R % 09.08.2016
CM No.11221/2016
RFA(OS) 25/2016, CM Nos. 11220/2016, 11222/2016 & 11223/2016
the appellant to withdraw the appeal and the pending applications.
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
PRATIBHA RANI, J.
AUGUST 09, 2016/ ‘pg’
M/S J M Construction Pvt Ltd
Krishna Sachdev
Pradeep Nandrajog
Pratibha Rani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
