The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal filed against the Single Judge. The court affirmed the rejection of an interim injunction, noting jurisdictional bars under the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 for suits concerning agricultural land title.
Appeal dismissed; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
BRAHMA NAND SHARMA & ORS ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms.Shilip Jain Sharma, Advocate.
versus
GAON SABHA NANGLOI JAT & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Additional Standing Counsel, GNCTD/R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R
% 15.01.2016
CM No.24083/2015
FAO(OS) 584/2015
FAO(OS) 584/2015
Page 1 of 2
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JANUARY 15, 2016 ‘vn’
Page 2 of 2
FAO(OS) 584/2015
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal against the dismissal of interim injunction application should be allowed.
Whether jurisdiction of a Civil Court for a suit for declaration of title is barred under Section 185 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Hathi vs. SunderApplied¶15
1970 (2) SCC 841 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Brahma NAND SHARMA & ORS
GAON SABHA NANGLOI JAT & ORS
Pradeep Nandrajog
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
