Disposed

Gail (India) Ltd. v. Prism Cement Limited

Delhi HC18 Jan 2016FAO(OS)/656/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of an appeal against an order restraining invocation of a letter of credit pending arbitration proceedings. While noting that the remedy was to apply for vacating the order or requesting a sooner date, the Court preponed the hearing date to February 1, 2016 upon respondent's consent. The substantive ad-interim order remains untouched, with pleadings pending.

What did the court decide?

The date of hearing of OMP (I) No.520/2015 fixed for February 18, 2016 was cancelled and it was listed for February 01, 2016 before the Roster Bench; the substantive ad-interim order was left untouche

Gail (India) Ltd. Vs Prism Cement Limited — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

$~10

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

FAO(OS) 656/2015 GAIL (INDIA) LTD ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Sanjay Jain, ASG instructed by Mr.Prashanto C Sen, Mr.Shivanshu and Ms.Natasha Thakur, Advocates.

¶4

versus

¶5

PRISM CEMENT LIMITED ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Sudhir K.Makkar and Ms.Meenakshi Singh, Advocates.

¶6

CORAM:

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

¶8

O R D E R % 18.01.2016

¶9

OMP (I) No.520/2015 filed by respondent under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying that pending adjudication of the dispute before the Arbitral Tribunal the appellant be restrained from invoking the letter of credit came up for admission before the learned Single Judge on September 15, 2015.

¶10

Recording tentative reasons, as they are excepted to be when an adinterim injunction is being granted (in contra distinction to an interim injunction which is decided with full reasons after hearing the parties) the learned Single Judge recorded reasons, (prima-facie of course) as to why till the next date of hearing the debt notes issued by the appellant be not recovered i.e. restrained the invocation of the letter of credit. The next date of hearing FAO(OS) 656/2015 Page 1 of 2

¶11

fixed by the learned Single Judge is February 18, 2016.

¶12

Since the impugned order is an ad-interim order and is not an interim order after hearing the parties post completion of the pleadings we are of the opinion that the remedy of the appellant was to either file an application under Order 39 Rule 4 of Code of Civil Procedure praying for the order in question to be vacated or to have prayed to the learned Single Judge for date to be preponed.

¶13

In matters of commerce, taking cognizance of a proceeding praying for an interim measure pending adjudication of the dispute before the Arbitral Tribunal on September 15, 2015 the learned Single Judge listed the matter for consideration after five months. This long date may not be warranted. The date of February 18, 2016 was too distant in the future.

¶14

Under the circumstances, without commenting upon the ad-interim order and leaving all objections taken by the appellant open, we dispose of the appeal preponing the date of OMP (I) No.520/2015 for which we have the respondent’s consent. The date of February 18, 2016 is cancelled.

¶15

OMP (I) No.520/2015 would be listed before the Roster Bench on February 01, 2016.

¶16

The learned Single Judge would hear arguments in the OMP, provided the appellant has completed the pleadings by way of filing reply to the same and the reply being on record.

¶17

No costs.

¶18

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

¶19

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

¶20

JANUARY 18, 2016/‘vn’

¶21

Page 2 of 2

¶22

FAO(OS) 656/2015

Gail (India) Ltd. v. Prism Cement Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gail (India) Ltd. v. Prism Cement Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Geeta Dutta & Ors. Vs M/S Capitol Art House (P) Ltd.

M/S National Highways Authority of India Vs M/S Bsc-Rbm-Pati Joint Venture

M/S Quest Marine Services Vs M/S Inter Ocean Shipping India Pvt. Ltd.

Brahma Nand Sharma & Ors. Vs Gaon Sabha Nangloi Jat & Ors.

India-Cis Chamber of Commerce & Industry Vs Dr Jyotsna Chaudhri & Ors.

Baldev Raj Gadhok Vs Suman Kumar Gadhok & Ors.

Maj Retd Sukesh Behl & Anr. Vs Koninklijke Philips Electronics N v

Gunja International Ltd. and Anr. Vs Narinder Kumar Dua and Ors.

M/S Quest Marine Services Vs M/S Inter Ocean Shipping India Pvt. Ltd.

Brahma Nand Sharma & Ors. Vs Gaon Sabha Nangloi Jat & Ors.

M/S Bakemans Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs Assets Reconstruction Company of India Limited & Ors.

Narotam Sayal Vs Mayar India Ltd. & Ors.

Anil Tyagi Vs Arun Sharma & Anr.

Anil Tyagi Vs Arun Sharma & Anr.