Division Bench disposed of an appeal filed against an order dismissing a civil application. After identifying substantial flaws in the caption and reasoning of the impugned order, the court accepted the appellant's request to withdraw, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
NAROTAM SAYAL ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms.Puja Singh, Advocate
versus
MAYAR INDIA LTD & ORS .....Respondents Represented by: None
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
%
O R D E R 18.01.2016
page 1 of 2
FAO(OS) 703/2015
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JANUARY 18, 2016 rb
page 2 of 2
FAO(OS) 703/2015
Narotam Sayal
Mayar India Ltd & Ors
Pradeep Nandrajog
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
