The Division Bench disposed of an appeal against an ad-interim injunction without adjudication, as the Single Judge had reserved a final interim order. The appeal was dismissed against costs.
Ad-interim injunction order reserved by Single Judge is commonly subsumed in final interim order; Appeal dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R
%
18.01.2016
Page 1 of 3
interim order against the appellant, we dispose of the appeal without adjudicating the controversy raised therein concerning the ad-interim order passed by the learned Single Judge which would obviously be merged in the final interim order (superseding the ad-interim order) which would now be passed by the learned Single Judge.
CM No.26576/2015 (Stay) and 31093/2015 (u/S 151 CPC)
Applications are dismissed as infructuous.
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JANUARY 18, 2016/‘vn’
FAO(OS) 625/2015 Page 3 of 3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Reliance Life Sciences Private Limited
Genentech Inc
Pradeep Nandrajog
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
