HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS)…
Six weeks time granted to appellant to deposit deficient court fees; impugned order shall operate if fees remain unpaid after deadline.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
B S OBEROI ..... Appellant Through: Mr Manish Kumar, Mr Amit Kumar, Mr Piyush Kaushik and Ms Nalini Singh
versus
P S OBEROI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms Prabhsahay Kaur for R-3 Mr Rajiv Nayyar, Sr Advocate with Mr Aman Avinav and Shantanu Tyagi for R-9 to 11
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
O R D E R % 13.01.2016
This appeal is directed against the order dated 16.12.2015 whereby the learned Single Judge has not granted further time for payment of the deficient court fees. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that some more time be granted as a final measure to the appellant to deposit the deficient court fees. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and we feel that this appeal can be disposed of by granting six weeks time to the appellant from today to deposit the deficient court fees. No further extension of time would be granted. If the deficient court fees is not deposited then the impugned order shall operate.
The appeal stands disposed of.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
JANUARY 13, 2016 SU
B S Oberoi
P S Oberoi & Ors
Badar Durrez Ahmed
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
