In this writ petition for criminal protection, the Delhi High Court directed the State to provide necessary security to two petitioners, a Hindu-Muslim couple facing threats from their respective families, by allocating them a police SHO and contact details.
Directed State to provide protection via SHO concerned after assessing threat element.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~66
GAURAV & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Prabhat Kaushik, Advocate. versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, ASC for the State/R-1 with SI Gaurav, PS Jahangir Puri. Ms.Rakhi Dueby, Advocate for R-5.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
O R D E R % 13.01.2016
W.P.(CRL) 89/2016 Page 1 of 2
PRATIBHA RANI, J.
JANUARY 13, 2016
‘st’
W.P.(CRL) 89/2016
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the State is directed to provide protection to petitioners apprehending threat from family members.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gaurav & Anr.
State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
Pratibha Rani
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
