Anuj Tyagi v. Stae & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings. The High Court of Delhi granted leave and rejected the petition as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Leave granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings.
What the court decided
$~26
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 95/2016
| ANUJ TYAGI | ..... Petitioner | |
|---|---|---|
| Through: | Ms Saakshi Agrawal and Mr Sagar Aggarwal, Advocates. |
|
| versus | ||
| STAE & ORS | Through: | ..... Respondents Ms Richa Kapoor, Addl. Standing Counsel (Crl.) with SI Jitender Rana, PS- Burari, Delhi. |
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL O R D E R
% 12.01.2016
Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings in accordance with law. Leave and liberty granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JANUARY 12, 2016 ` mk
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anuj Tyagi
- respondent
STAE & ORS
Coram
Siddharth Mridul
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court