Petitioner sought to ensure prior punishment did not affect future parole/furlough applications. Court held punishment has no impact on such applications and disposed of the petition.
Punishment awarded vide order dated 30.03.2015 shall have no impact on furlough/parole applications to be moved by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
PUSHPENDER ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr.Satender K.Mishra, Advocate with Mr.Ashutosh K.Singh, Advocate.
versus
STATE ( NCT ) OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Ms.Richa Kapoor, ASC with Mr.Ashish Negi & Mr.Rohit Kaul, Advocates. SI Om Parkash.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R
% 14.01.2016
page 1 of 2
W.P.(CRL) 2111/2015
prayer of the petitioner at this juncture is that this punishment should have no impact on the parole / furlough applications to be filed by the petitioner. To this, learned Addl. Standing Counsel has no objection.
S.P.GARG, J
JANUARY 14, 2016 / tr
page 2 of 2
W.P.(CRL) 2111/2015
1 issue framed by the court
Whether prior punishment awarded to the petitioner should impact future parole or furlough applications.
Pushpender
State (NCT) of Delhi
S.P. Garg
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
