Dismissed
Kamal v. State (Nct of Delhi)
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/2747/2015
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Ordered to the discharge for extension of parole by six weeks, the court found that the existing parole granted for later filing an appeal is sufficient and no extension is justified.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~57
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(CRL) 2747/2015
¶4
KAMAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Javed Alvi, Advocate.
¶5
versus
¶6
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Jamal Akhtar, Advocate for Mr.Rahul Mehra, St.Counsel for the State with SI Roshan Lal, PS Nangloi.
¶7
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
¶8
O R D E R % 10.02.2016
¶9
Crl.M.A. No.2346/2016
¶10
- By filing the present application, the petitioner is seeking extension of parole by six weeks.
¶11
- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parents of the petitioner are suffering from various old age ailments and the petitioner wants to spend more time with them. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that parole granted to the petitioner vide order dated 13.01.2016 may be extended for a period of six weeks.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
KAMAL
- respondent
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Coram
AI extract
PRATIBHA RANI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court