The Court accepted an unconditional apology from respondents regarding delay in communicating the Board's decision to the petitioner, finding the delay was not wilful, and disposed of the petition and application.
Apology accepted; petition and application disposed of; notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~A-6
| DELHI INTERNA | TIONAL A | IRPORT |
|---|---|---|
| PRIVATE LTD. | .... Petitioner | |
| Through versus |
Mr.Atul Sharma, Advocate. | |
| GAURI KUMAR | (SECRETA | RY), |
| UNION OF INDI | A & ANR | ..... Respondent |
| Through | Mr.Sanjay Jain, ASG with | |
| Mr.Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Ms.Rajul Jain and Ms.Ragini Singh, Advocates for UOI. |
||
| Mr.Kamlesh Kumar Mishra and | ||
| Mr.Sija Nayar Pal, Advocates for the intervener |
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 07.01.2016
After some arguments, Mr.Sanjay Jain, learned Additional Solicitor General tenders unconditional apology on behalf of the respondents in not communicating the decision of the Board to the petitioner within a period of one week.
On a perusal of the record, this Court is of the view that the delay in communicating the decision of the Board was not wilful. Consequently, the apology tendered is accepted by this Court.
Accordingly, the petition and the application are disposed of and the notices issued are discharged.
MANMOHAN, J
JANUARY 07, 2016/rb
Delhi International Airport Private Ltd
Gauri Kumar
Union of India
Delhi International Airport Private Ltd vs. Mr. Atul Sharma
Manmohan
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
