The court disposed of a contempt petition filed alleging disobedience of an order directing cadre review, finding the petition infructuous due to an extension of time granted by the Division Bench.
Contempt petition and application disposed of as infructuous; notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
#5
$~
S P SINGH ADG (RETD) ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sameer Sharma, Proxy Counsel for Mr. Padma K., Advocate
versus
L C GOYAL & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC for UOI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 05.01.2016
Present contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 7th January, 2015 passed by the Division Bench in W.P.(C) 121/2015 whereby respondents were directed to carry out cadre review of Group ‘A’ officers of CRPF within four months.
On 21st July, 2015, this Court had issued the notice to respondents.
However, the Division Bench on 26th November, 2015 extended the time for carrying out the cadre review upto 31st January, 2016.
In view of the subsequent extension of time, present contempt petition and application are infructuous and they, accordingly, stand disposed of. Notices issued are discharged. The next date of hearing is cancelled.
MANMOHAN, J
JANUARY 05, 2016 rn
S P SINGH ADG (RETD)
L C GOYAL & ANR
MANMOHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
