The Court disposed of the contempt petition as satisfied, noting the admitted compliance with the impugned order. Issued notices were discharged.
Contempt petition disposed of as satisfied; notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
JAMILA HASINA ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Archana Gaur, Adv.
versus
SUDIP KUMAR SINHA, DIG, CASO ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay, Adv. for UOI
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 08.01.2016
Since the admitted position is that the order in question has been complied with, the present contempt petition is disposed of as satisfied and the notices issued are discharged.
MANMOHAN, J
JANUARY 08, 2016 NG
Jamila Hasina
Sudip Kumar Sinha
Manmohan
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
