The single paragraph order records the withdrawal of a contempt petition with liberty to file execution proceedings.
The contempt petition and application are dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~A-1
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAJINDER KUMAR & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Ms.Geetanjali Mohan, Advocate with Mr.Sultan Chaudhary, Advocate.
versus
PARAS RAM & ANR ..... Respondents Through Manish Kumar Saryal and Ms.Susha Unni, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 06.01.2016
Learned counsel for the petitioners wishes to withdraw the present contempt petition with liberty to file execution proceedings.
With the aforesaid liberty, the present contempt petition and application are dismissed as withdrawn.
As a matter of abundant precaution, it is clarified that the withdrawal of the present petition will not prejudice the rights of the petitioners to file execution proceedings.
MANMOHAN, J
JANUARY 06, 2016 rb
RAJINDER KUMAR & ORS.
PARAS RAM & ANR.
MANMOHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
